From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 816293840C2A; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:29:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 816293840C2A From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/98265] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:29:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc cc target_milestone keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:29:11 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98265 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gcc-10 has significantly |[10/11 Regression] gcc-10 |worse code generated with |has significantly worse |-O2 compared to -O1 (or |code generated with -O2 |gcc-9 -O2) when using the |compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 |Eigen C++ library |-O2) when using the Eigen | |C++ library CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Keywords| |missed-optimization --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The TU might be too small so we run into inline limits too quickly?=