public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
@ 2020-12-14 14:50 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-14 14:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98279] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-14 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279

            Bug ID: 98279
           Summary: ICE in apply_scale with
                    --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

The following fails:

$ cat test.c
int a() {}
$ aarch64-elf-gcc test.c -c -O --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=2147483648
during GIMPLE pass: cdce
test.c: In function 'a':
test.c:1:5: internal compiler error: in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:1082
    1 | int a() {}
      |     ^
0xcf2c8d profile_count::apply_scale(long, long) const
        /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.h:1082
0xce6ed7 maybe_hot_count_p(function*, profile_count)
        /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:175
0xce7459 maybe_hot_bb_p(function*, basic_block_def const*)
        /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:193
0xce76c1 optimize_bb_for_size_p(basic_block_def const*)
        /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:301
0xe11269 execute
        /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c:1195
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.

Related to PR98271 and PR98276 (both ICEs that occur when a --param is >=
2^31). Perhaps a meta-bug would be useful here?

Equally, perhaps I'm misunderstanding the contract for --param values: are
these meant to be user-facing or internal? I.e. is it expected that the
compiler ICEs if the user provides an unreasonable value for the param?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/98279] ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
  2020-12-14 14:50 [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-14 14:55 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-14 16:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-14 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #0)
> The following fails:
> 
> $ cat test.c
> int a() {}
> $ aarch64-elf-gcc test.c -c -O --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction=2147483648
> during GIMPLE pass: cdce
> test.c: In function 'a':
> test.c:1:5: internal compiler error: in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:1082
>     1 | int a() {}
>       |     ^
> 0xcf2c8d profile_count::apply_scale(long, long) const
>         /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/profile-count.h:1082
> 0xce6ed7 maybe_hot_count_p(function*, profile_count)
>         /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:175
> 0xce7459 maybe_hot_bb_p(function*, basic_block_def const*)
>         /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:193
> 0xce76c1 optimize_bb_for_size_p(basic_block_def const*)
>         /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/predict.c:301
> 0xe11269 execute
>         /home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c:1195
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
> See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
> 
> Related to PR98271 and PR98276 (both ICEs that occur when a --param is >=
> 2^31). Perhaps a meta-bug would be useful here?
> 
> Equally, perhaps I'm misunderstanding the contract for --param values: are
> these meant to be user-facing or internal? I.e. is it expected that the
> compiler ICEs if the user provides an unreasonable value for the param?

My understanding is the compiler should never ICE, even for developer-oriented
params. The fact that this is an ICE due to an outrageous input to a param
would lower the priority of the bug, but it doesn't invalidate it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/98279] ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
  2020-12-14 14:50 [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-14 14:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98279] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-14 16:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-16  9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-16  9:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-14 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-12-14

--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Let me fix that.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/98279] ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
  2020-12-14 14:50 [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-14 14:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98279] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-14 16:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-16  9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-12-16  9:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-16  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska <marxin@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c5eb7e4872025e8d5e8ae2f0e568403f7c8803d

commit r11-6111-g5c5eb7e4872025e8d5e8ae2f0e568403f7c8803d
Author: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue Dec 15 09:57:19 2020 +0100

    options: fix integer overflow

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            PR rtl-optimization/98271
            PR rtl-optimization/98276
            PR tree-optimization/98279
            * opts-common.c (set_option): Do not allow overflow for integer
            arguments.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR rtl-optimization/98271
            PR rtl-optimization/98276
            PR tree-optimization/98279
            * gcc.dg/pr98271.c: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/98279] ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31
  2020-12-14 14:50 [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-12-16  9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-16  9:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-16  9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98279

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-16  9:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-14 14:50 [Bug tree-optimization/98279] New: ICE in apply_scale with --param=hot-bb-frequency-fraction >= 2^31 acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-14 14:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98279] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-14 16:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-16  9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-16  9:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).