From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1AA8A3945C3F; Sun,  7 Feb 2021 11:30:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1AA8A3945C3F
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/98341] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with
 Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access on m68k
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:30:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98341-4-ORiwhchtaG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:30:37 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98341

--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-be=
rlin.de> ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #7)
> In other words, the bisect result isn't very useful here and I'd recommend
> investigating this change from scratch, getting a useful backtrace from g=
db
> and understanding where this is crashing and then why.

I can certainly generate a backtrace in GDB, but I'm not an Ada expert whic=
h is
why I reported the issue and hoped that the author of the change would be a=
ble
to understand what the problem is.

It could also be possible that the change makes some assumptions of the
underlying ABI that may well be true for x86_64 but not m68k.=