public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/98353] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1053 since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 21:48:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98353-4-OHyaJLd4Eo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98353-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98353

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:550880a31688f1031a21efe7923c86db423cbbf1

commit r11-6321-g550880a31688f1031a21efe7923c86db423cbbf1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 22:45:56 2020 +0100

    c++: Fix up floating point complex handling in build_zero_init_1 [PR98353]

    While the gimplifier patch I've just committed fixed an ICE, in some cases
    like on the committed testcase cp folding doesn't happen after
    build_zero_init_1 because it is called already during gimplification.

    For the scalar types, if we want to use convert, the problem with complex
floats
    is that it returns a COMPLEX_EXPR with FLOAT_EXPR arguments which have
    INTEGER_CST 0 as argument.  As fold isn't recursive, it doesn't do anything
    in that case, we need to first fold those FLOAT_EXPRs to REAL_CST 0.0 and
    only afterwards the COMPLEX_EXPR can be folded into COMPLEX_CST with 0.0
    arguments.

    This patch instead just uses build_zero_cst that creates the zero constant
for
    any scalar types (and more) directly, instead of going through multiple
hops.

    2020-12-23  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/98353
            * init.c (build_zero_init_1): Use build_zero_cst for SCALAR_TYPE_P
            zero initializers.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-23 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 16:47 [Bug c++/98353] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1053 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-12-18  8:44 ` [Bug c++/98353] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1053 since r6-4886-gcda0a029f45d20f4 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 12:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 12:47 ` [Bug c++/98353] [8/9/10/11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 12:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 23:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-21 23:33 ` [Bug c++/98353] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-23 21:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-05  8:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06  9:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06  9:46 ` [Bug c++/98353] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98353-4-OHyaJLd4Eo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).