From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E8FA3387086F; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:47:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E8FA3387086F From: "pskocik at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/98418] New: Valid integer constant expressions based on expressions that trigger -Wshift-overflow are treated as non-constants Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:47:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pskocik at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:47:15 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98418 Bug ID: 98418 Summary: Valid integer constant expressions based on expressions that trigger -Wshift-overflow are treated as non-constants Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pskocik at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This causes things like: struct foo { unsigned bit: (0xffffffffll<<40)!=3D0; }; to elicit a -pedantic warning about the bitfield width not being a proper integer constant expression, even though it is. In other contexts, a complete compilation error might ensue: extern int bar[ (0xffffffffll<<40)!=3D0 ]; //seen as an invalid VLA https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/7zfz96 Neither clang nor gcc <=3D 5 appear to have this bug. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93241 seems related.=