public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mscfd at gmx dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/98426] find_symbol in module.c traverses O(N) part of a search tree
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:15:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98426-4-DnFqOxYWXq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426

--- Comment #3 from martin <mscfd at gmx dot net> ---
Sorry for the noise, but as this gives big reductions in compilation time it is
quite important to me (and probably other big module based projects).

I just realised that I mixed up gfc_symtree->name and gfc_symtree->n.sym->name.
The reason why find_symbol traverses the whole tree in the worst case is that
it is ordered by gfc_symtree->name but it looks for gfc_symtree->n.sym->name.

So far I got the impression that either gfc_symtree->name is a unique name
("@xxx") or equal to gfc_symtree->n.sym->name (if n.sym!=NULL). In this case,
the following patch should do the trick and traverse only log(N) of the tree:

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/module.c b/gcc/fortran/module.c
index 4c6ff22d5c1..8dc59e25d46 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/module.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/module.c
@@ -4659,10 +4659,20 @@ find_symbol (gfc_symtree *st, const char *name,
        return st;
     }

+  c = strcmp (name, st->name);
+  if (c < 0)
+    retval = find_symbol (st->left, name, module, generic);
+  else if (c > 0)
+    retval = find_symbol (st->right, name, module, generic);
+  else
+    retval = NULL;
+
+/* original traverse
   retval = find_symbol (st->left, name, module, generic);

   if (retval == NULL)
     retval = find_symbol (st->right, name, module, generic);
+*/

   return retval;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-29 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 10:42 [Bug fortran/98426] New: " mscfd at gmx dot net
2020-12-28 10:29 ` [Bug fortran/98426] " mscfd at gmx dot net
2020-12-28 10:36 ` mscfd at gmx dot net
2020-12-29 11:15 ` mscfd at gmx dot net [this message]
2021-10-29 18:36 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-23 20:40 ` matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
2024-04-23 23:26 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24  2:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-24  3:05 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-25 11:20 ` matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
2024-04-25 16:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-26  3:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-26 12:43 ` matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
2024-04-26 15:53 ` matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
2024-04-26 15:54 ` matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
2024-04-27  2:34 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98426-4-DnFqOxYWXq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).