public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/98454] Apparent wrong initialization in function result
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 09:47:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98454-4-mp7mbTtsdP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98454
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to martin from comment #9)
> Problems with default initialisation of function result were fixed with
> PR45489. The relevant testcase added by this PR is initialization_27.f90
> which looks very similar to the reported problem (minus the non-initialised
> components).
Maybe they were addressed, but not fixed.
A further reduced testcase for the present problem:
program p
implicit none
type t
integer :: unit = -1
end type t
type(t) :: x
x = g()
if (x% unit /= -1) stop 2
x = f()
if (x% unit /= -1) stop 3
contains
function f()
type(t) :: f
end function f
function g()
type(t) :: g
if (g% unit /= -1) stop 1
end function g
end
The program fails with
STOP 3
Looking into the tree-dump shows that g() is fine, f() is not.
Thanks for the pointer to PR45489, which may provide a starting point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-28 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-27 13:28 [Bug fortran/98454] New: " fmartinez at gmv dot com
2020-12-27 19:54 ` [Bug fortran/98454] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-27 21:25 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-27 21:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-27 21:59 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-27 22:01 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-27 22:15 ` ffadrique at gmail dot com
2020-12-27 22:18 ` ffadrique at gmail dot com
2020-12-27 23:07 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2020-12-28 8:46 ` mscfd at gmx dot net
2020-12-28 9:47 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-12-28 15:19 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-98454-4-mp7mbTtsdP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).