From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 224A0384241B; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:59:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 224A0384241B
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/98454] Apparent wrong initialization in function result
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:59:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98454-4-tvRkWgjjrB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98454-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:59:19 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98454

--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> I think there already exists at least one PR with issues with initializer=
s.
>=20
> A reduced testcase shows that default initialization works for intent(out=
),
> whereas you get random junk for function results.

(code elide)

> If you need a workaround, uncomment the indicated line.

The code is invalid Fortran.  gfortran can do anything.
Your work around is invalid.  gfortran can do anything.

>>From Fortran 2018:

"If the function result is not a pointer, its value shall be
defined by the function."

and
"A derived-type scalar object is defined if and only if all
of its nonpointer components are defined."


Should be closed as invalid as the original code contains a number
of issues caused by invalid code.=