From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2DF543858022; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:52:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2DF543858022
From: "xiao.liu@compiler-dev.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/98458] PRINT the array constructed from implied do-loop
 throw ICE
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:52:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xiao.liu@compiler-dev.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98458-4-FMoNn9Gjec@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98458-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98458-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:52:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98458

--- Comment #5 from xiao.liu@compiler-dev.com <xiao.liu@compiler-dev.com> -=
--
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4)
> Created attachment 49856 [details]
> Fix for the PR
>=20
> Thank you for the report on this problem.
>=20
> The attached patch fixes the problem and regression tests OK. I need to d=
o a
> bit more thinking about it because I was unable to find a point in general
> expression simplification where the fix could be applied. Instead, it only
> seems to work in the simplification of intrinsic functions. Fortunately,
> this seems to be the only place where it is needed.
>=20
> Paul

As a beginner of FORTRAN, I am not sure about the result of implied do-loop
which contains array section, so add "print" to check. Thanks for your
attention on this problem.=