From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7A6B43849ADF; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:05:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7A6B43849ADF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713938739; bh=XS6Ph6ATMRHK24+lIgDcGIhOSwB16VoHRDqj+YfWWPY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RUEaTOIu7HiCY5aJHcxXk83UnQN9imOtHoy6W5xE1e75Lu3onSeHKhdklfil143N5 AxcWimwO4jwT1F6c33q6RR8G/A5rkcFk10jM82gECAHr7w/rFcp0QdRVjtEa30x7Ou 6nhsst+guCoNYd0Mine5dM8YIfiKxuEK1cl2BWfE= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/98477] aarch64: Unnecessary GPR -> FPR moves for conditional select Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:05:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98477 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- here is a testcase for the fcsel usage for integer: ``` void foo (int a, double *b) { double t =3D a ? 10000.0 : 200.0; register double tt __asm__("x0"); tt =3D t; asm("":"+r"(tt)); *b =3D tt; } ```=