From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AB7D53896C39; Mon,  4 Jan 2021 23:23:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AB7D53896C39
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/98519] rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction
 error in pveclib
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:23:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98519-4-9Sz1XjNzWT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98519-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:23:45 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98519

--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #2)
> That fell off the plate.  I imagine we are going to need a hook with asm
> that makes sure none of the memory references are PC-relative.

I guess since we cannot see which mnemonic is used in the inline asm, we ha=
ve
to be conservative and always reject pc-relative addresses with the "m"
constraint (other constraints too?).

Do we need to create a new memory constraint inline asm users can use to say
pc-relative addresses are ok?  How does x86 handle this?=