public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
@ 2021-01-05 12:39 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98528] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
Bug ID: 98528
Summary: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
i586-unknown-freebsd11.4, x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.4
The new g++.dg/modules/hello-1 test FAILs on Solaris and FreeBSD:
+UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 execute
+UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 execute
+FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 link
+FAIL: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 link
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
_ZL16__gthread_active /var/tmp//ccAd8Hnb.o
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
This should be extern "C" __gthread_active instead, there's no mangled version
in libgcc.
Besides, the UNRESOLVED and FAIL lines are identical for both the -std=c++17
and
c++2a. However, different tests are supposed to have different test names.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 12:39 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:42 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98528] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 13:42 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Could you provide the -save-temps .ii files please? I suspect something
different in the solaris system headers.
it seems to be losing the c++17/2a distinguisher in the test name ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98528] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:42 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 13:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49888
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49888&action=edit
i386-pc-solaris2.11 32-bit hello-1_[ab].ii
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-05 13:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-05 13:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:26 ` [Bug c++/98528] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-05 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #1)
> Could you provide the -save-temps .ii files please? I suspect something
> different in the solaris system headers.
Sure, attached.
> it seems to be losing the c++17/2a distinguisher in the test name ...
I believe I've seen the same on other failing modules tests on gcc-testresults
as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-05 13:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-26 12:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:53 ` [Bug c++/98528] [modules] " nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-26 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Any update?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [modules] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-26 12:26 ` [Bug c++/98528] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-26 12:53 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-26 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|[11 Regression] |[modules]
|g++.dg/modules/hello-1 |g++.dg/modules/hello-1
|FAILs |FAILs
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-02-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [modules] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-26 12:53 ` [Bug c++/98528] [modules] " nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-03 12:28 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2021-03-03 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Any update?
At least on Solaris, the failures are gone since 20210113.
However, gcc-testresults still shows similar failures for
i586-unknown-freebsd12.2 and pru-unknown-elf, though it's impossible to
tell what exactly is wrong there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [modules] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2021-03-03 12:28 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-03 13:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-03 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
do you have preprocessed source for those other failing platforms? my guess is
they have different system headers, particularly around threading?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [modules] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-03 12:28 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-03 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-03 13:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2021-03-03 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> do you have preprocessed source for those other failing platforms? my guess is
> they have different system headers, particularly around threading?
Unfortunately not: I just saw the failures on gcc-testresults. I don't
have any idea about PRU at all; maybe Gerald is able to help with FreeBSD?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/98528] [modules] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-03 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2021-03-03 13:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-03 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528
Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell <nathan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ok, thanks for the explanation. I'll close this one as what was reported has
been fixed :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-03 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-05 12:39 [Bug c++/98528] New: g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 12:39 ` [Bug c++/98528] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:42 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-05 13:47 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:26 ` [Bug c++/98528] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:53 ` [Bug c++/98528] [modules] " nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 12:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-03 12:28 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-03 13:36 ` nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).