From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 035EE384640E; Fri, 10 May 2024 12:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 035EE384640E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715344752;
	bh=4emk/xwOB6MpSJptvfNszloq74WhYPuCxzSx0+TloQ8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZDCcyvyCgIbEAJMrbUuXpnJfXNv2cWSFjPl3hvnbssixonfiZDs1kkmNLmEJ37CdY
	 8io5oNrJzdj7XtFI99FsddzjopQl2UDeGfupuuVoS6/JMCjIMVPuGeEKvZRwf5xpns
	 TtzIrARt4eXTBcQjpt9jT6nI5I6OtpYR4mgzaJQo=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/98529] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression]
 g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 12:39:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98529-4-cgcAaVl1um@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98529

--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see it's a common issue on Solaris: instead of the expected

 Depset:0 decl entity:204 function_decl:'::fprintf'

as found on Linux, we have

 Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf'

What's the best way to handle this: just allow for the alternative form in
the scan-lang-dump?=