public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524
@ 2021-01-07 22:53 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 22:54 ` [Bug testsuite/98593] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-07 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593
Bug ID: 98593
Summary: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc
execution error after r11-6524
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:19f3c433cdc92f1ad6c37f182d5034b03c54afef, r11-6524
This started failing as an execution error with this revision. Previously it
was an excess errors failure.
Before r11-6524:
FAIL: 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:43:
error: 'nextdownl' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'nexttowardl'?
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:44:
error: 'nextupl' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'expl'?
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:176:
error: 'nextdownl' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'nexttowardl'?
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:185:
error: 'nextupl' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'expl'?
After r11-6524:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc:104:
void test01(): Assertion '!strcmp(to_chars_buffer, printf_buffer+strlen("0x"))'
failed.
FAIL: 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution test
commit 19f3c433cdc92f1ad6c37f182d5034b03c54afef
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jan 7 12:41:14 2021 -0500
libstdc++: Fix long double to_chars testcase [PR98384]
The testcase was failing to compile on some targets due to its use of
the non-standard functions nextupl and nextdownl. This patch makes the
testcase instead use the C99 function nexttowardl in an equivalent way.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/98384
* testsuite/20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc: Use nexttowardl
instead of the non-standard nextupl and nextdownl.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/98593] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524
2021-01-07 22:53 [Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-07 22:54 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-08 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 15:06 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-07 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Build| |powerpc64-linux-gnu
Target| |powerpc64-linux-gnu
Host| |powerpc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note: failure is only on powerpc64 BE. Works OK on LE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/98593] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524
2021-01-07 22:53 [Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 22:54 ` [Bug testsuite/98593] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-08 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 15:06 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-08 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/98593] [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524
2021-01-07 22:53 [Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 22:54 ` [Bug testsuite/98593] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-08 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-03 15:06 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-03 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98593
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This should now be fixed by r11-7337.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-03 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-07 22:53 [Bug testsuite/98593] New: [11 regression] 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc execution error after r11-6524 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 22:54 ` [Bug testsuite/98593] " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-08 8:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-03 15:06 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).