From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 633343850415; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:24:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 633343850415
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/98620] SFINAE code in class specialization generates warnings
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:24:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc
Message-ID: <bug-98620-4-PN0fmHpcio@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98620-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:24:01 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98620

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can be fixed like this:

--- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c
@@ -1563,6 +1563,7 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init,
int nested, int flags,

      /* Warn when some struct elements are implicitly initialized.  */
      if ((complain & tf_warning)
+         && !cp_unevaluated_operand
          && !EMPTY_CONSTRUCTOR_P (init))
        warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
             "missing initializer for member %qD", field);
@@ -1593,6 +1594,7 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init,
int nested, int flags,
      /* Warn when some struct elements are implicitly initialized
         to zero.  */
      if ((complain & tf_warning)
+         && !cp_unevaluated_operand
          && !EMPTY_CONSTRUCTOR_P (init))
        warning (OPT_Wmissing_field_initializers,
             "missing initializer for member %qD", field);=