From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5311E3858D33; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:42:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5311E3858D33 From: "pdimov at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/98649] New: Trivial jump table not eliminated Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:42:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pdimov at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:42:45 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98649 Bug ID: 98649 Summary: Trivial jump table not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pdimov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Trivial jump tables where all entries are the same are sometimes not eliminated. E.g. the following example ``` struct Base { virtual void run( float f ) =3D 0; }; struct T0: Base { void run( float f ); }; struct T1: Base { void run( float f ); }; struct T2: Base { void run( float f ); }; struct T3: Base { void run( float f ); }; struct T4: Base { void run( float f ); }; template struct mp_int {}; struct variant { unsigned index_; union { T0 t0_; T1 t1_; T2 t2_; T3 t3_; T4 t4_; }; T0& get( mp_int<0> ) { return t0_; } T1& get( mp_int<1> ) { return t1_; } T2& get( mp_int<2> ) { return t2_; } T3& get( mp_int<3> ) { return t3_; } T4& get( mp_int<4> ) { return t4_; } }; template decltype(auto) get( variant& v ) { return v.get( mp_int() ); } void f1( variant& v, float f ) { switch( v.index_ ) { case 0: get<0>(v).run( f ); break; case 1: get<1>(v).run( f ); break; case 2: get<2>(v).run( f ); break; case 3: get<3>(v).run( f ); break; case 4: get<4>(v).run( f ); break; default: __builtin_unreachable(); } } ``` (https://godbolt.org/z/MxzGh8) results in ``` f1(variant&, float): mov eax, DWORD PTR [rdi] lea r8, [rdi+8] jmp [QWORD PTR .L4[0+rax*8]] .L4: .quad .L3 .quad .L3 .quad .L3 .quad .L3 .quad .L3 .L3: mov rax, QWORD PTR [rdi+8] mov rdi, r8 mov rax, QWORD PTR [rax] jmp rax ``` This case may seem contrived, but it's not that rare in practice, because c= ode using std::variant or equivalent (such as Boost.Variant2, from which the example has been reduced) is becoming more and more common nowadays.=