public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/98776] DW_AT_low_pc is inconsistent with function entry address, when enabling -fpatchable-function-entry
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 17:12:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98776-4-6Ip1CxP4wT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98776

--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop <spop@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09c91caeb84e7c3609a12a53b57e5219a1dd2b15

commit r13-4561-g09c91caeb84e7c3609a12a53b57e5219a1dd2b15
Author: Sebastian Pop <spop@amazon.com>
Date:   Wed Nov 30 19:45:24 2022 +0000

    AArch64: Add UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA [PR98776]

    Currently patchable area is at the wrong place on AArch64.  It is placed
    immediately after function label, before .cfi_startproc.  This patch
    adds UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA for pseudo patchable area instruction and
    modifies aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry to avoid placing
    patchable area before .cfi_startproc.

    gcc/
            PR target/98776
            * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_output_patchable_area):
            Declared.
            * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
(aarch64_print_patchable_function_entry):
            Emit an UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA pseudo instruction.
            (aarch64_output_patchable_area): New.
            * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (UNSPECV_PATCHABLE_AREA): New.
            (patchable_area): Define.

    gcc/testsuite/
            PR target/98776
            * gcc.target/aarch64/pr98776.c: New.
            * gcc.target/aarch64/pr92424-2.c: Adjust pattern.
            * gcc.target/aarch64/pr92424-3.c: Adjust pattern.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-08 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21  6:32 [Bug debug/98776] New: " lvlin at mail dot ustc.edu.cn
2021-03-31 10:21 ` [Bug debug/98776] " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-29 17:06 ` luis.machado at linaro dot org
2021-06-30  6:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-30  6:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-30  7:12 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-30  8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-30  8:20 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-30  8:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 20:50 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01  3:11 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 17:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-12-15 15:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-15 15:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-15 15:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-15 15:15 ` spop at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98776-4-6Ip1CxP4wT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).