From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5B599383B82D; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:06:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B599383B82D
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/98776] DW_AT_low_pc is inconsistent with function entry
 address, when enabling -fpatchable-function-entry
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:06:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98776-4-MryHg0hAEL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:06:38 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98776

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > Martin, can you bisect what fixed it?
>=20
> Sure. Please help me how to verify what is a correct output? Isn't that
> related to DWARF 5 change done in GCC 11?

It's consistent with -gdwarf-2 -gstrict-dwarf as well, so no.

A broken executable will output a short disassembly from gdb:


> gcc-10 t.c -g -O -fpatchable-function-entry=3D16
> gdb -ex 'disassemble foo' -batch ./a.out | wc -l
3

actual output is

Dump of assembler code for function foo:
   0x00000000004004a6 <+0>:     ret=20=20=20=20
End of assembler dump.

where a correctly working one is

> gdb -ex 'disassemble foo' -batch ./a.out | wc -l
19

with output

Dump of assembler code for function foo:
   0x0000000000400476 <+0>:     nop
   0x0000000000400477 <+1>:     nop
   0x0000000000400478 <+2>:     nop
   0x0000000000400479 <+3>:     nop
   0x000000000040047a <+4>:     nop
   0x000000000040047b <+5>:     nop
   0x000000000040047c <+6>:     nop
   0x000000000040047d <+7>:     nop
   0x000000000040047e <+8>:     nop
   0x000000000040047f <+9>:     nop
   0x0000000000400480 <+10>:    nop
   0x0000000000400481 <+11>:    nop
   0x0000000000400482 <+12>:    nop
   0x0000000000400483 <+13>:    nop
   0x0000000000400484 <+14>:    nop
   0x0000000000400485 <+15>:    nop
   0x0000000000400486 <+16>:    ret=20=20=20=20
End of assembler dump.=