public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in BB frequencies
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:06:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98782-4-02J19hNnjd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782

--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't know how relevant this is to the exchange2 problem yet,
but for:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
#define PROB 0.95

struct L {
  int data;
  L *next;
  L *inner;
};

template<int N>
struct S {
  static __attribute__((always_inline)) void f(L *head, int inc) {
    while (head) {
      asm volatile ("// Loop %0" :: "i" (N));
      int subinc = head->data + inc;
      if (__builtin_expect_with_probability (bool(head->inner), 0, PROB))
        S<N-1>::f(head->inner, subinc);
      head->data = subinc;
      head = head->inner;
    }
  }
};

template<>
struct S<0> {
  static void f(L *, int) {
    asm volatile ("// foo" ::: "x0", "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7");
  }
};

void x(L *head) { S<10>::f(head, 1); }
---------------------------------------------------------------------

compiled on aarch64 with -O3, we always seem to spill in the outer
loops regardless of the value of PROB.  That is, the inner loops
always seem to get priority even if their bb frequencies are low.
I would have expected that moving PROB from 0.05 (inner loop very
likely to be executed) to 0.95 (inner loop very likely to be skipped)
would have moved the spills from the outer loops to the inner loops.

An unrelated issue on aarch64 is that IP0 and IP1 are explicitly
clobbered by call instructions, via CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.
We have to do this because the linker is allowed to insert code
that clobbers those registers even if we “know” that the target
of the call doesn't clobber them.  However, clobbering the registers
that way prevents them from being used for registers that are live
across the call, even if the call is very unlikely to be executed.
Hacking a fix for that does reduce the number of spills, but doesn't
get rid of the ones that matter in exchange2.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 14:31 [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] New: IRA artificially creating spills due to " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-21 14:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] " jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 10:12 ` fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-01-29 13:34 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 12:02 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11 Regression] Bad interaction between IPA frequences and IRA resulting in spills due to changes in " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23  2:11 ` jiangning.liu at amperecomputing dot com
2021-02-23 12:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-28 19:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11/12 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-29  1:33 ` jiangning.liu at amperecomputing dot com
2021-11-29  6:59 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-03 11:44 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-03 11:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 11:19 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 11:21 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 11:21 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 19:44 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 23:52 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08  9:33 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 14:31 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 15:02 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 19:56 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 20:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-09 21:27 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 11:36 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 14:38 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 14:40 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-12-14 14:48 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 14:58 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-12-14 15:07 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 15:08 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 18:16 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-15 12:15 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-20 18:06 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-31 17:28 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-04 22:26 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-04 22:29 ` pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 14:53 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10  1:29 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-11 10:14   ` Jan Hubicka
2022-01-10 14:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 14:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 14:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 14:47 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-10 14:52 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98782] [11 " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-11 10:14 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-01-11 14:22 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98782-4-02J19hNnjd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).