public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] sparcv8 regression
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 17:33:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98784-4-Ap6GsaaJYU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98784-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98784
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Thread model: posix
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
> gcc version 10.2.0 (Buildroot 2020.11-999-g57d61a3986)
>
> I can't give more debug info since all program segfault, even gdb or
> gdbserver.
Thanks, definitively puzzling. I don't see how the patch can change anything
in a compilation not involving PIC/PIE or TLS. If it does, then something
really weird might be going on but, at the same time, nobody has been testing
--with-cpu=v8 for a decade or two I think so this is plausible. I'm going to
give it a try.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-23 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 22:13 [Bug c/98784] New: [gcc 8.4/9.3/10] " romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-01-21 23:01 ` [Bug c/98784] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-21 23:26 ` romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-01-21 23:43 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 7:33 ` [Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-23 11:43 ` romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-01-23 17:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-23 20:07 ` romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-01-23 21:56 ` [Bug target/98784] [8/9/10/11 Regression] problematic build of uClibc with -fPIC ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-24 9:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-26 21:24 ` romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-01-26 22:29 ` romain.naour at gmail dot com
2021-04-09 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:54 ` [Bug target/98784] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-28 16:40 ` yann at sionneau dot net
2021-06-28 16:50 ` yann at sionneau dot net
2022-05-27 9:44 ` [Bug target/98784] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:38 ` [Bug target/98784] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-08 9:51 ` wbx at openadk dot org
2024-04-30 15:05 ` [Bug target/98784] [11/12/13/14/15 " dm.chestnykh at gmail dot com
2024-04-30 17:55 ` dm.chestnykh at gmail dot com
2024-04-30 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-98784-4-Ap6GsaaJYU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).