From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9E37338930E6; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:17:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9E37338930E6 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/98854] [11 Regression] cray benchmark is about 15% slower since r11-4428-g4a369d199bf2f34e Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:17:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:17:30 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98854 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98854 >=20 > --- Comment #7 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- > > I used -O3 but -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize also vectorizes it. >=20 > I must be blind, but I see for the current master: >=20 > gcc pr98854.c -c -O2 -ftree-slp-vectorize -fdump-tree-optimized=3D/dev/st= dout >=20 > foo (int n) > { > unsigned long ivtmp.8; > double y; > double x; > double _6; > double _8; > double _9; > double _11; > int _14; > void * _29; > unsigned long _31; >=20 > : > ivtmp.8_28 =3D (unsigned long) &MEM[(void *)&a + 8184B]; > _31 =3D (unsigned long) &a; >=20 > : > # x_1 =3D PHI <0.0(2), x_10(5)> > # y_2 =3D PHI <0.0(2), y_12(5)> > # ivtmp.8_18 =3D PHI > _29 =3D (void *) ivtmp.8_18; > _6 =3D MEM[base: _29, offset: 0B]; > _8 =3D MEM[base: _29, offset: 8B]; > _9 =3D _6 + _8; > x_10 =3D _9 + x_1; > _11 =3D _6 / _8; > y_12 =3D _11 + y_2; > _14 =3D bar (); > if (_14 !=3D 0) > goto ; > else > goto ; >=20 > : > a[0] =3D x_10; > a[1] =3D y_12; > return; >=20 > : > ivtmp.8_27 =3D ivtmp.8_18 - 8; > if (ivtmp.8_27 !=3D _31) > goto ; > else > goto ; >=20 > } Hmm, maybe my dev tree has related adjustments to SLP ... at least the posted patch fixes the regression for me.=