public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in split2 pass
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:47:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98863-4-LGZclKvx6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98863-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863

--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Wow, so the MIR problem starts with

static void
df_mir_alloc (bitmap all_blocks)
{   
...
  EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (all_blocks, 0, bb_index, bi)
    {
...
          bitmap_set_range (&bb_info->in, 0, DF_REG_SIZE (df));
          bitmap_set_range (&bb_info->out, 0, DF_REG_SIZE (df));

I'll see if I can apply the same trick I applied to tree PRE when it
had its "maximum set".

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 11:19 [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 11:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 13:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 13:21 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 14:14 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 14:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 15:09 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 15:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 15:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 15:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-29  9:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:56 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 10:18 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 10:24 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-01-29 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 11:03 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE pass rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 11:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 12:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 12:50 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, CPROP, PRE and LRA passes rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 12:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 13:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 13:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 14:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 15:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 15:56 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-01-29 16:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01  8:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01  9:31 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 10:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 12:07 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 12:30 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 12:45 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/98863] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-01 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 10:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 12:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08  8:45 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08  9:01 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-02-08  9:23 ` richard.sandiford at arm dot com
2021-02-08  9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 12:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 12:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-10 13:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 15:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-15 15:34 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98863-4-LGZclKvx6y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).