public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/98868] [8/9/10/11 Regression] polyhedron rnflow.f90 regression since r8-2555-g344be1fd47d7d64e
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:21:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98868-4-A39fcJNo23@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98868

--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98868
> 
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It's likely about a small loop alignment:
> 
> # Overhead  Command  Shared Object         Symbol                              
> # ........  .......  ....................  ....................................
> #
>     78.19%  a.out    a.out                 [.] matsim_
>     17.00%  a.out    a.out                 [.] evlrnf_
> 
> matsim_ hot place (with --show-total-period)
> 
> SLOW:
> 
>      8653282 :   4017cb: imul   $0x3243f6ad,%esi,%esi
>              :            genuni():
>              :            genuni = us231 * real (jsee)
>    726254541 :   4017d1: vxorps %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0
>              :            jsee = jsee * jmul + jadd
>            0 :   4017d5: add    $0x1b0cb175,%esi
>              :            genuni = us231 * real (jsee)
>    105853662 :   4017db: vcvtsi2ss %esi,%xmm0,%xmm0
>    273371557 :   4017df: vmulss %xmm1,%xmm0,%xmm0
>              :            gentrs_():
>              :            do icls = icls1, ncls
>    454049783 :   4017e3: cmp    $0xffffffff,%edi
>      2165881 :   4017e6: je     401970 <matsim_+0x470>
>            0 :   4017ec: cmp    $0x1,%edi
>      1081799 :   4017ef: jne    4017cb <matsim_+0x2cb>
>      2155914 :   4017f1: mov    %r9,%rdx
>      4307088 :   4017f4: mov    %r8d,%ecx
>            0 :   4017f7: jmp    401811 <matsim_+0x311>
>            0 :   4017f9: nopl   0x0(%rax)
>   8624612913 :   401800: inc    %ecx
>     42153493 :   401802: add    $0x400,%rdx
>    484044717 :   401809: cmp    $0x101,%ecx
>     38933067 :   40180f: je     4017cb <matsim_+0x2cb>
> 
> FAST:
> 
>     45442445 :   4017c9: imul   $0x3243f6ad,%edx,%edx
>              :            genuni():
>              :            genuni = us231 * real (jsee)
>      1076892 :   4017cf: vxorps %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0
>              :            jsee = jsee * jmul + jadd
>      3245642 :   4017d3: add    $0x1b0cb175,%edx
>              :            jsee = ibits(jsee, 0, 31)                   !
> Replacement
>      1083699 :   4017d9: and    $0x7fffffff,%edx
>              :            genuni = us231 * real (jsee)
>            0 :   4017df: vcvtsi2ss %edx,%xmm0,%xmm0
>     76652291 :   4017e3: vmulss %xmm1,%xmm0,%xmm0
>              :            gentrs_():
>              :            do icls = icls1, ncls
>    166631920 :   4017e7: cmp    $0xffffffff,%edi
>      3251886 :   4017ea: je     401970 <matsim_+0x470>
>            0 :   4017f0: cmp    $0x1,%edi
>            0 :   4017f3: jne    4017c9 <matsim_+0x2c9>
>            0 :   4017f5: mov    %r9,%rcx
>            0 :   4017f8: mov    %r8d,%esi
>      1083364 :   4017fb: jmp    401811 <matsim_+0x311>
>            0 :   4017fd: nopl   (%rax)
>   1099920836 :   401800: inc    %esi
>    209587136 :   401802: add    $0x400,%rcx
>    100391619 :   401809: cmp    $0x101,%esi
>     69184337 :   40180f: je     4017c9 <matsim_+0x2c9>
> 
> For some reason the hottest "inc" instruction has in fast version ~10x smaller
> number of cycles.
> The instruction takes 20% of cycles in the slow version.

So we likely enter the loop at 401800 and I see the SLOW version
is slightly smaller overall (but only 3 bytes).  So might be some
uop cache or branch predictor aliasing issue in the uarch.  For
some reason we do not align the 40180f backedge jump destination.
The extra and in the FAST case is somewhat odd, but I suppose
we avoid some overflow condition on the conversion by masking
the sign bit?  Maybe the VRP change causes us to assume overflow
doesn't happen.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 15:26 [Bug tree-optimization/98868] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  7:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98868] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:09 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2021-01-29  9:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29  9:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98868-4-A39fcJNo23@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).