From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id F2F7A398881A; Tue,  2 Feb 2021 14:32:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2F7A398881A
From: "markus.kuehni at triviso dot ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/98933] P0784R7 example support: constexpr new
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:32:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: markus.kuehni at triviso dot ch
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98933-4-VH3o4i8Wmk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:32:42 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98933

--- Comment #2 from Mark <markus.kuehni at triviso dot ch> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Have you noticed the
> In Kona 2019, this approach was considered too brittle, and as a result
> non-transient allocation was removed from the feature set.=20
> line just below that example?
> This is not valid C++20.

So just to understand this right. It is ok as long as it does not survive
compilation?

But how are you going to implement constexpr std::vector and std::string th=
en?=20

(I'm actually somehow trying to bridge the time until that happens ;-)=