From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4E14D386F009; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:20:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E14D386F009 From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/98977] New: [x86] Failure to optimize consecutive sub flags usage Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:20:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:20:19 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98977 Bug ID: 98977 Summary: [x86] Failure to optimize consecutive sub flags usage Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gabravier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- extern bool z, c; uint8_t f(uint8_t dest, uint8_t src) { u8 res =3D dest - src; z =3D !res; c =3D src > dest; return res; } With -O3, LLVM outputs this: f(unsigned char, unsigned char): mov eax, edi sub al, sil sete byte ptr [rip + z] setb byte ptr [rip + c] ret GCC outputs this: f(unsigned char, unsigned char): mov eax, edi sub al, sil sete BYTE PTR z[rip] cmp dil, sil setb BYTE PTR c[rip] ret It seems desirable to eliminate the `cmp`, unless there's some weird flag s= tall thing I'm not aware of.=