From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B8C98397283C; Mon,  8 Feb 2021 15:31:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8C98397283C
From: "zhan3299 at purdue dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug inline-asm/98991] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns
 per insn is achieved (90)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:31:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: zhan3299 at purdue dot edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-98991-4-yUrQea4xFr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98991-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98991-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:31:28 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98991

--- Comment #3 from zhan3299 at purdue dot edu ---
(In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #1)
> Is it a valid or invalid code, please?

Hi, sorry for the confusion. I used a simple delta debugging to reduce the
test-case, and it seems very confused.

Currently, I use C-Reduce to get a simple test-case:


--- poc.cc starts ---
void a() {
  float b;
  asm("" : "=3Drmf"(b) : "0"(0));
  &b;
}
--- poc.cc ends ---


run 'gcc poc.cc -fpermissive' and we can get the same ICE.


--- error trace starts ---
during RTL pass: reload
poc.cc: In function 'void a()':
poc.cc:5:1: internal compiler error: maximum number of generated reload ins=
ns
per insn achieved (90)
    5 | }
      | ^
0x20cb324 lra_constraints(bool)
        ../../gcc/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4951
0x20ab2c8 lra(_IO_FILE*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/lra.c:2440
0x1ff80de do_reload()
        ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5523
0x1ff80de (anonymous namespace)::pass_reload::execute(function*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/ira.c:5709
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
--- error trace ends ---


I test it with gcc 10.2.0, but it seems my native 7.5.0 also failed.=