From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B95B93857C6D; Fri,  1 Oct 2021 10:06:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B95B93857C6D
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99] Bug in template type in error message.
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:06:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.95.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-99-4-7Jh9xjKcCU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:06:06 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.or=
g,
                   |                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #22)
> Perhaps the only solution is to not pretty-print the candidates, which is
> exactly what clang does:
>=20
> pr99.cc:8:10: error: call to 'f' is ambiguous
>   return f(X<int>(), X<int>());
>          ^
> pr99.cc:4:26: note: candidate function [with Q =3D int]
> template<typename Q> int f(X<int>, X<Q>);
>                          ^
> pr99.cc:5:26: note: candidate function [with B =3D int]
> template<typename B> int f(X<B>, X<myint>);
>                          ^
>=20
> Dodji, as the diagnostics maintainer, would that be an acceptable fix?

While Dodji is still technically listed as a diagnostics maintainer, David
Malcolm has been more active as such lately, so I'm cc-ing him, too, to ask
him...=