From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 409123858C5E; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:40:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 409123858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679344823; bh=+c8+83XNErql3kb8I1oMAmeN6utwRoVOqU0hkE9J5fw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LjFHTtFLcysVDablcGstBl8cQjSlfu6J+H5NkkaI08TqB9dIIdN6gDaxXEN95lPql S5wCgL8AZNyF5maN3lVHu0+Qf6Yg8Av6K4RApvngtZkCVWg7wrVCOQoseF4qLLXfPt vesfnefSAQxz/FJJt+GUp9dkg6awG1u5boid73AE= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/99036] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_current_interface_head, at fortran/interface.c:4699 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:40:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99036 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Even simpler tentative patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc index c8f0bb83c2c..b29f491fe1f 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc @@ -9998,6 +9998,7 @@ gfc_match_modproc (void) if ((gfc_state_stack->state !=3D COMP_INTERFACE && gfc_state_stack->state !=3D COMP_CONTAINS) || gfc_state_stack->previous =3D=3D NULL + || !current_interface.type || current_interface.type =3D=3D INTERFACE_NAMELESS || current_interface.type =3D=3D INTERFACE_ABSTRACT) { This keeps the original error message without effort and regtests ok.=