From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 257C43858D29; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:16:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 257C43858D29 From: "ju.orth at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/99049] New: _Alignof ignores requested alignment of bit-field types in ms_struct struct Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:16:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ju.orth at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:16:46 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99049 Bug ID: 99049 Summary: _Alignof ignores requested alignment of bit-field types in ms_struct struct Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ju.orth at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Consider typedef int Int __attribute__((aligned(128))); struct __attribute__((ms_struct)) X { Int i:1; }; struct Y { char c; struct X x; }; int f(void) { return _Alignof(struct X); } int g(void) { return __builtin_offsetof(struct Y, x); } When compiling this on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, f returns 16 but g returns 128. I believe that _Alignof and __builtin_offsetof as above should always return the same value.=