From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7F0A4397143B; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:17:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F0A4397143B From: "vincent.hamp at higaski dot at" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99059] New: Static inline variable can't refer to itself Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:17:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent.hamp at higaski dot at X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:17:41 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99059 Bug ID: 99059 Summary: Static inline variable can't refer to itself Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vincent.hamp at higaski dot at Target Milestone: --- Declaring a static inline member variable and initializing it with a pointe= r to itself is currently impossible. The textbook example for such code would probably be a linked list of some sort: struct link { link* next{nullptr}; link* prev{nullptr}; }; struct list { static inline link tail{&tail, &tail}; }; list l; Making the member just static and initializing it outside of the class work= s, but this kinda breaks my mental model of "static inline" as just being syntactic sugar. Is this an actual bug or just some overlooked thing in the standard?=