From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BD2993857B8E; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:08:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BD2993857B8E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710486514; bh=XfPdkmp0M+vYPQ3SkO/mC9mlyiO8ojr1fl8KchkVLk8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FQ9NHzDzFEQuCPu82/Vc2Gim96K6rLnDpLEPwDyiiqdHoKBYOT30n5BQnPNdJiFgI w8725D72+cAouEmOkTmMmK6EIFg0b8zB5l6fwIb+UkZAkpP4Sn2NBNtuqgqaAHTtgo kckRKMLzA4ovQXNMD2Kp2TKGfRKkdKhsXxUTneUU= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/99065] ASSOCIATE function selector expression "no IMPLICIT type" failure Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:08:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99065 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- This mega-patch, on the scale of the importance of the problem, was required because of gfortran's one pass parsing. It might be a temporary fix because= I am contemplating how an initial pass of contained procedures might be introduced. Fixed on mainline. Paul=