public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/99117] [9/10/11 Regression] cannot accumulate std::valarray
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:01:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99117-4-2ueSn8udHw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99117-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99117

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem is that sum + e returns an expression template that holds
references to its operands, so that the sum is done lazily.

When that expression template result is assigned back to sum it evaluates the
sum of each element, which is basically:

struct valarray {
  int* __restrict__ _M_data;
  size_t _M_size;
};
valarray sum{ new int[2]{1,1}, 2 };
valarray rhs{ new int[2]{2,2}, 2 };
int* p = sum._M_data;
int* e1 = sum._M_data;
int* e2 = rhs._M_data;
for (size_t i = 0; i < sum._M_size; ++i, ++p)
  *p = e1[i] + e2[i];

Where p and e1 alias, but are marked with __restrict__.

Maybe we need to check for such aliasing in __valarray_copy.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-16  5:26 [Bug c++/99117] New: " yasui at icepp dot s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
2021-02-16  7:43 ` [Bug middle-end/99117] [9/10/11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16  7:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/99117] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16 10:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16 11:01 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-02-16 11:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16 11:40 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-02-16 11:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-16 11:54 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-02-16 14:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23  9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 10:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 11:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-02-23 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 13:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 14:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:19 ` [Bug libstdc++/99117] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27  9:44 ` [Bug libstdc++/99117] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/99117] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-08 21:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-15 11:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-16 15:12 ` [Bug libstdc++/99117] [11/12/13 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99117-4-2ueSn8udHw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).