From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 21C123858433; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 06:15:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 21C123858433 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689401745; bh=1Fp4knXeXBC2EEza+KQwQIxlgGcYzktbdI5T+xE9bR8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OTsmFfSjtJEaenc7KORcqmFOgtgwZAHHW2JWMUGPUgVJEGmfPIXQbzP+84tKLjmJk FEX0or1KLN8XvsAimgHGEW00o6RnQFrxlQ7hde0qiSdYYU55Mcykr82qlfN5TSzVGT v9QjufS7akLueTf0Bp2nhpeFnDyGpA3EnHe8bGs0= From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/99139] ICE: gfc_get_default_type(): Bad symbol '__tmp_UNKNOWN_0_rank_1' Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 06:15:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99139 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) > Updating known-to-work/known to fail version. >=20 > Paul/Steve: do you want to assign this PR to one of you? I am of two minds as to whether or not to backport the patch or to close the PRs as resolved. Thoughts? Paul=