public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/99151] New: Missed optimization: Superfluous stack frame and code with noreturn or __builtin_unreachable()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:45:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99151

            Bug ID: 99151
           Summary: Missed optimization: Superfluous stack frame and code
                    with noreturn or __builtin_unreachable()
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
  Target Milestone: ---

The following test code:

_Noreturn void r(void);
void u(void);

void g(void)
{
        r();
}


void f(void)
{
        u();
        __builtin_unreachable();
}

Produces code the following code on a sample set of architectures. There should
be no stack frame set up. There should be no instructions after the no-return
function calls (for example sparc).

sparc-rtems6-gcc -O2 -o - -S unreachable.c 
        .file   "unreachable.c"
        .section        ".text"
        .align 4
        .global g
        .type   g, #function
        .proc   020
g:
        save    %sp, -96, %sp
        call    r, 0
         nop
        nop
        .size   g, .-g
        .align 4
        .global f
        .type   f, #function
        .proc   020
f:
        save    %sp, -96, %sp
        call    u, 0
         nop
        nop
        .size   f, .-f
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 10.2.1 20210205 (RTEMS 6, RSB
61dcadee0825867ebe51f9f367430ef75b8fe9c0, Newlib d4a756f)"

arm-rtems6-gcc -O2 -o - -S unreachable.c 
        .cpu arm7tdmi
        .eabi_attribute 20, 1
        .eabi_attribute 21, 1
        .eabi_attribute 23, 3
        .eabi_attribute 24, 1
        .eabi_attribute 25, 1
        .eabi_attribute 26, 2
        .eabi_attribute 30, 2
        .eabi_attribute 34, 0
        .eabi_attribute 18, 4
        .file   "unreachable.c"
        .text
        .align  2
        .global g
        .arch armv4t
        .syntax unified
        .arm
        .fpu softvfp
        .type   g, %function
g:
        @ Function supports interworking.
        @ Volatile: function does not return.
        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
        push    {r4, lr}
        bl      r
        .size   g, .-g
        .align  2
        .global f
        .syntax unified
        .arm
        .fpu softvfp
        .type   f, %function
f:
        @ Function supports interworking.
        @ Volatile: function does not return.
        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
        push    {r4, lr}
        bl      u
        .size   f, .-f
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 10.2.1 20210205 (RTEMS 6, RSB
61dcadee0825867ebe51f9f367430ef75b8fe9c0, Newlib d4a756f)"
powerpc-rtems6-gcc -O2 -o - -S unreachable.c 
        .file   "unreachable.c"
        .machine ppc
        .section        ".text"
        .align 2
        .globl g
        .type   g, @function
g:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        stwu 1,-16(1)
        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
        mflr 0
        stw 0,20(1)
        .cfi_offset 65, 4
        bl r
        .cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
        .size   g,.-g
        .align 2
        .globl f
        .type   f, @function
f:
.LFB1:
        .cfi_startproc
        stwu 1,-16(1)
        .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
        mflr 0
        stw 0,20(1)
        .cfi_offset 65, 4
        bl u
        .cfi_endproc
.LFE1:
        .size   f,.-f
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 10.2.1 20210205 (RTEMS 6, RSB
61dcadee0825867ebe51f9f367430ef75b8fe9c0, Newlib d4a756f)"
        .section        .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits

             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 14:45 sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de [this message]
2021-02-18 14:52 ` [Bug c/99151] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-18 14:56 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2021-02-18 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-19  6:46 ` [Bug middle-end/99151] " sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2021-03-01 11:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01 12:36 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2021-03-01 12:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01 13:04 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2021-03-01 13:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99151-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).