From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8C02C398B88E; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:21:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8C02C398B88E From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99153] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected binding_vector, have overload in maybe_record_mergeable_decl, at cp/name-lookup.c:3562 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:21:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:21:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99153 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think this is a duplicate of 99071, which hadn't been done when Mattias tested.=20=20 However, I am getting a different ICE: devvm1702:235>./xg++ -B./ -nostdinc++ -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I../../..//src/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -std=3Dc++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header iostream devvm1702:236>./xg++ -B./ -nostdinc++ -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I../../..//src/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -std=3Dc++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header utility devvm1702:237>./xg++ -B./ -nostdinc++ -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -I../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I../../..//src/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I../../../src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -std=3Dc++20 -fmodules-ts -x c++-system-header algorithm ../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/algorithm: internal compiler er= ror: in make_dependency, at cp/module.cc:12514 0xd06a9a depset::hash::make_dependency(tree_node*, depset::entity_kind) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:12514 0xd07ae1 depset::hash::add_dependency(tree_node*, depset::entity_kind) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:12712 0xcf24e0 trees_out::decl_node(tree_node*, walk_kind) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:8605 0xcf4a73 trees_out::tree_node(tree_node*) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:9168 0xce2700 trees_out::vec_chained_decls(tree_node*) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:4981 0xd02052 trees_out::write_class_def(tree_node*) ../../../src/gcc/cp/module.cc:11737 which does appear to be new.=