From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6C4C53858C66; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C4C53858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714052774;
	bh=xKy3q5MhLil5/z+8mZt94F/LqmbFTcJ2IZJWIn9lCk4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OypIZoSP2yzIVD1nVIaaHlhZif9hj1xRzdBfOTXDIBNefhFEKb+aOLJQDwMG973cR
	 2LyqbcbHWtsn4r+JPeoaT026W+BV4A+p2zz788JR+LhxgeEtTncSKQCRgr6t1LiJ9w
	 BouUyxessUK5r3mZhwgErdzqh2K/cFcCOsh+7WHM=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/99183] [11 Regression] Incompatible Runtime types
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:46:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-99183-4-CSNYDoUZKW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99183-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99183-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99183

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > This seems to have been fixed between r12-4097 and r12-4638.
>=20
> Duplicate of pr102745, fixed by r12-4464?

Yes, indeed. It applies cleanly to 11-branch and fixes the problem.

As soon as regtesting is finished, I will push and close.

Cheers

Paul=