From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0022E3857C71; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:02:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0022E3857C71 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/99197] New: Built-ins for packing/unpacking __ibm128 not documented Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:02:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:02:56 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99197 Bug ID: 99197 Summary: Built-ins for packing/unpacking __ibm128 not documented Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc*-*-* https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Basic-PowerPC-Built-in-Functions-Availab= le-on-all-Configurations.html has the prototypes: double __builtin_unpack_ibm128 (__ibm128, int); __ibm128 __builtin_pack_ibm128 (double, double); But they are undocumented. The simplest fix might be to just point to the next section of the docs and= say they behave the same as the corresponding __builtin_xxx_longdouble built-in= s.=