From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BD80E384241F; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:09:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BD80E384241F
From: "jbaptistapsilva at yahoo dot com.br" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99200] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ used as template parameter
 causes internal compiler error (segmentation fault)
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:09:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbaptistapsilva at yahoo dot com.br
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99200-4-oFZAjav1h9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99200-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99200-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:09:03 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99200

--- Comment #4 from JoaoBapt <jbaptistapsilva at yahoo dot com.br> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> Looks like a dup of 93383.

No, because it works perfectly when I substitute __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for any
other string literal, even as big as one that would be "returned" by
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (I tested with, for example, "consteval const char*
type_name<T>() [with T =3D double]" and it did not crash and worked perfect=
ly).=