public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "stefansf at linux dot ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/99212] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c line 971
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:05:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99212-4-K8uka8kIxa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99212-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment #17 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> ---
The new testcases introduced by commit d3b1ef7a83c fail on IBM Z as well as
some older data-model tests:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 113)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 115)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 117)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 119)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 121)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 123)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 125)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 127)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 24)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 26)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 29)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 31)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 36)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 41)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 81)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 83)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 85)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 87)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 92)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 94)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for warnings, line 96)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/bitfields-1.c (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 947)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 950)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 965)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 968)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for excess errors)
The actual warning for those failing tests is "UNKNOWN".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 3:35 [Bug analyzer/99212] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 8:27 ` [Bug analyzer/99212] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 14:49 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-25 23:02 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-25 23:03 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 12:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 14:23 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 14:33 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-04 21:57 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09 23:11 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-10 17:45 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 12:59 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 2:23 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 2:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` [Bug analyzer/99212] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 18:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-08 19:30 ` [Bug analyzer/99212] [11 " dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-15 8:05 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com [this message]
2021-06-15 14:28 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-15 21:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-18 7:36 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2021-07-02 19:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-02 19:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-02 19:31 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-99212-4-K8uka8kIxa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).