public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
@ 2021-02-23 18:29 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-02-23 18:46 ` [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2021-02-23 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Bug ID: 99225
Summary: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Affects versions down to at least r5 :
$ cat z1.c
#define vector __attribute__((vector_size(16)))
int f ()
{
vector int a = {0, 0, 0, 0};
vector int b = {1, 0, 0, 0};
return (a & (1 << b)) != 0;
}
$ gcc-11-20210221 -c z1.c
z1.c: In function 'f':
z1.c:6:3: internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
6 | return (a & (1 << b)) != 0;
| ^~~~~~
0xde3e1e wide_int_to_tree_1
../../gcc/tree.c:1644
0xde433b wide_int_to_tree(tree_node*, poly_int<1u,
generic_wide_int<wide_int_ref_storage<false, true> > > const&)
../../gcc/tree.c:1756
0xde433b build_int_cst(tree_node*, poly_int<1u, long>)
../../gcc/tree.c:1396
0x8945ea fold_binary_loc(unsigned int, tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*,
tree_node*)
../../gcc/fold-const.c:12048
0x894caa fold_build2_loc(unsigned int, tree_code, tree_node*, tree_node*,
tree_node*)
../../gcc/fold-const.c:13715
0x69e80b c_fully_fold_internal
../../gcc/c/c-fold.c:371
0x69e00d c_fully_fold_internal
../../gcc/c/c-fold.c:623
0x69f0a9 c_fully_fold(tree_node*, bool, bool*, bool)
../../gcc/c/c-fold.c:125
0x65c2cd c_finish_return(unsigned int, tree_node*, tree_node*)
../../gcc/c/c-typeck.c:10742
0x6918b6 c_parser_statement_after_labels
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:6162
0x69339a c_parser_compound_statement_nostart
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:5788
0x693c13 c_parser_compound_statement
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:5597
0x6954c8 c_parser_declaration_or_fndef
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:2539
0x69c337 c_parser_external_declaration
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:1777
0x69ce59 c_parser_translation_unit
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:1650
0x69ce59 c_parse_file()
../../gcc/c/c-parser.c:21984
0x6eccc2 c_common_parse_file()
../../gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1218
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2021-02-23 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-23 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2021-02-23
Summary|ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE
|at tree.c:1644 |in wide_int_to_tree_1, at
| |tree.c:1644
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ICEs since r0-119394-ga212e43fca22f730987ad4d15a0bd58efae9677e , before that
it has been rejected.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-02-23 18:46 ` [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-23 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-23 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-02-23 18:46 ` [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-23 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 11:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-23 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50244
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50244&action=edit
gcc11-pr99225.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-23 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-24 11:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 11:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-24 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e646abbe02f2c79cc3ba1f3de705ee62ff9dcd1
commit r11-7356-g6e646abbe02f2c79cc3ba1f3de705ee62ff9dcd1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:10:25 2021 +0100
fold-const: Fix up ((1 << x) & y) != 0 folding for vectors [PR99225]
This optimization was written purely with scalar integers in mind,
can work fine even with vectors, but we can't use build_int_cst but
need to use build_one_cst instead.
2021-02-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99225
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case NE_EXPR>: In (x & (1 << y))
!= 0
to ((x >> y) & 1) != 0 simplifications use build_one_cst instead of
build_int_cst (..., 1). Formatting fixes.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-24 11:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-24 11:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-19 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-24 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
|in wide_int_to_tree_1, at |wide_int_to_tree_1, at
|tree.c:1644 |tree.c:1644
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-24 11:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-19 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-20 8:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4de402ab60c54fff48cb7371644b024d10d7e5bb
commit r10-9476-g4de402ab60c54fff48cb7371644b024d10d7e5bb
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:10:25 2021 +0100
fold-const: Fix up ((1 << x) & y) != 0 folding for vectors [PR99225]
This optimization was written purely with scalar integers in mind,
can work fine even with vectors, but we can't use build_int_cst but
need to use build_one_cst instead.
2021-02-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99225
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case NE_EXPR>: In (x & (1 << y))
!= 0
to ((x >> y) & 1) != 0 simplifications use build_one_cst instead of
build_int_cst (..., 1). Formatting fixes.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 6e646abbe02f2c79cc3ba1f3de705ee62ff9dcd1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-19 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-20 8:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-20 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
|wide_int_to_tree_1, at |wide_int_to_tree_1, at
|tree.c:1644 |tree.c:1644
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 10.3 too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-20 8:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-20 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c9f7293c995b662457b4e7aba97a6faa4d86dc5
commit r9-9426-g7c9f7293c995b662457b4e7aba97a6faa4d86dc5
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:10:25 2021 +0100
fold-const: Fix up ((1 << x) & y) != 0 folding for vectors [PR99225]
This optimization was written purely with scalar integers in mind,
can work fine even with vectors, but we can't use build_int_cst but
need to use build_one_cst instead.
2021-02-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99225
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case NE_EXPR>: In (x & (1 << y))
!= 0
to ((x >> y) & 1) != 0 simplifications use build_one_cst instead of
build_int_cst (..., 1). Formatting fixes.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 4de402ab60c54fff48cb7371644b024d10d7e5bb)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 16:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cf570d10449a35fe4f5e45db087a527eefd0dcf3
commit r8-10891-gcf570d10449a35fe4f5e45db087a527eefd0dcf3
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Feb 24 12:10:25 2021 +0100
fold-const: Fix up ((1 << x) & y) != 0 folding for vectors [PR99225]
This optimization was written purely with scalar integers in mind,
can work fine even with vectors, but we can't use build_int_cst but
need to use build_one_cst instead.
2021-02-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99225
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case NE_EXPR>: In (x & (1 << y))
!= 0
to ((x >> y) & 1) != 0 simplifications use build_one_cst instead of
build_int_cst (..., 1). Formatting fixes.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99225.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 4de402ab60c54fff48cb7371644b024d10d7e5bb)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-22 16:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99225
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-23 18:29 [Bug c/99225] New: ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1644 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-02-23 18:46 ` [Bug c/99225] [8/9/10/11 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 19:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 11:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-24 11:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-19 23:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-20 8:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99225] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).