public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/99235] New: Null pointer check incorrectly deleted for static pointer
@ 2021-02-24  3:20 sebastianquilter at gmail dot com
  2021-02-24  3:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99235] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: sebastianquilter at gmail dot com @ 2021-02-24  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99235

            Bug ID: 99235
           Summary: Null pointer check incorrectly deleted for static
                    pointer
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sebastianquilter at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

int main()
{
    static char* ptr = (char*)1;
    --ptr;
    if(ptr){
        return 1;
    }
    return 0;
}

Compiled with -O0, it returns 0
Compiled with -O1, it returns 1
Compiled with -O1 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks, it returns 0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/99235] Null pointer check incorrectly deleted for static pointer
  2021-02-24  3:20 [Bug tree-optimization/99235] New: Null pointer check incorrectly deleted for static pointer sebastianquilter at gmail dot com
@ 2021-02-24  3:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-24  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99235

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Once a pointer is "valid", it can never become a null pointer if decremented or
incremented.  So this code is undefined and GCC is doing an ok thing to do.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-24  3:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-24  3:20 [Bug tree-optimization/99235] New: Null pointer check incorrectly deleted for static pointer sebastianquilter at gmail dot com
2021-02-24  3:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99235] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).