From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EC965382E801; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:55:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC965382E801 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/99264] latest glibc release breaks Ada buildr on Linux Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:55:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc bug_status cf_gcctarget short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:55:17 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99264 Eric Botcazou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc do= t gnu.org CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target| |*-*-linux-gnu Summary|Ada doesn't build against |latest glibc release breaks |latest glibc |Ada buildr on Linux --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > However, there is little that we can do. The hardware requirements have > changed under us, so even the kernel does not have much choice here. > Applications really have to adapt to the massively increased size of the > register file, there really is no way around that. Providing a new constant minimal default would have been better IMO, even i= f it would have been significantly larger than the current one, than breaking a = long established practice.=