public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rs2740 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99273] New: List initialization prefers initializer_list a little too strongly Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:39:31 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99273-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99273 Bug ID: 99273 Summary: List initialization prefers initializer_list a little too strongly Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rs2740 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This is basically bug 64665 but closed back in 2015 - I think incorrectly. Reduced test case: #include <initializer_list> struct S { S(int); }; void f(std::initializer_list<S>); int f(int); using T = decltype(f({1})); using T = int; GCC rejects (picking the initializer_list<S> overload); Clang accepts. {1} to initializer_list<S> is a user-defined conversion (https://eel.is/c++draft/over.ics.list#5); {1} to int is a standard conversion - in particular, the identity conversion (https://eel.is/c++draft/over.ics.list#10.1). Since the conversion sequences are not of the same basic form, https://eel.is/c++draft/over.ics.rank#2 controls and says that the latter is better. DR 1467 modified what is now https://eel.is/c++draft/over.ics.rank#3.1 to say that a list initialization sequence that converts to initializer_list is better than any other list-initialization sequence "even if one of the other rules in this paragraph would otherwise apply", but paragraph 3 only applies when the two conversion sequences have the same basic form. In the above example, they don't.
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 21:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-25 21:39 rs2740 at gmail dot com [this message] 2021-03-03 17:28 ` [Bug c++/99273] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 14:16 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 22:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99273-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).