From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F359B3858C2B; Mon, 8 May 2023 21:16:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F359B3858C2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683580608; bh=VhahA+jh+PsImOWJNMPnuFysiD8GJ3mRwIT4XZaVPe8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WkyHLfiyi4ffzx0za3dZMLaRBzM7eLcpur8ZGrzsN4WefPDEUWHaD5k+5NN2aoC9G 0sSkk7ioYJkAa2IjojcJ86xwSh5+Ggdioo/soIAGO42sIgztxLzdJi46v5RgbNDKoZ TTf580Xgmt7+7C6qCqd+lQHdvW2lHdqHaqioobzU= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/99277] C++2a synchronisation is inefficient in GCC 11 Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 21:16:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99277 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #19) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18) > > We have not committed to a stable ABI for C++20 yet. >=20 > That was my argument when creating this bug report two years ago: if it's > available in the standard headers to be used without explicit, opt-in > actions by the users, it's committed. N.B. explicit opt-in is required: -std=3Dc++20 or similar. The default mode does not provide std::barrier etc.=