From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 13BBF3858C2C; Mon,  8 May 2023 20:52:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 13BBF3858C2C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683579165;
	bh=AtZ01Nv4E8/fpVoSNCFjXaLK1Gn7HknxerNmZDgwxsI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tmQcEDdQ121+F8wu09j1gW1TqGW9N6LXLt7LXk+/wS6PN6kNjsDYAChYgn4PvYkk7
	 0511+Hb/mzbxjoX/Nu41H/s/rBsZaxXxDAe/OPT4S9/W20LAoCqoYsFtsJ9DNRzPN0
	 jCyEKIGC7P5rSwO+cU9nc1jV+mrwsyJGN5d0APmY=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/99277] C++2a synchronisation is inefficient in GCC 11
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 20:52:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99277-4-kAoAP89RM5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99277-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99277

--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We've already done it with other C++20 types, and we did it with C++17 types
before that.=