From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5B3D43858C36; Mon, 8 May 2023 20:55:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B3D43858C36 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683579354; bh=yLkEmTn7pPWre6KZD7+KszAysgG/kXEgDvZD4Qcm5vI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=D2alpBs2r9voDZdQw/K/ux3RKGojwzjE0m7MQz96KFh2bnX3F0YGxU0SLAnClNfSQ Gr5PdGGuiSbcdO6nnGZDWVrBW9bkQSeynoBJOGiu3+PErnmCZmalZRRBggedmJUPdE 0D3ZEYM1cCwNE/E2w3zL7T3zrxh+sflSRKGWEf2c= From: "thiago at kde dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/99277] C++2a synchronisation is inefficient in GCC 11 Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 20:55:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: thiago at kde dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99277 --- Comment #21 from Thiago Macieira --- I understand that. I don't think it's a reason to repeat the policy, though. Anyway, I don't have any new arguments than when we discussed this two years ago, so I won't pursue this matter further.=