public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/99293] Built-in vec_splat generates sub-optimal code for -mcpu=power10
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:52:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99293-4-odhQMA7peY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99293

Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-02-27
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It generates non-optimal code for older CPUs as well (it does two splats
instead of one:

        xxpermdi 0,35,35,3       # 7    [c=4 l=4]  vsx_extract_v2di/1
        xxpermdi 35,0,0,0        # 9    [c=4 l=4]  vsx_splat_v2di_reg/0
        vrlq 2,2,3

This is because we get things like

Trying 7 -> 9:
    7: r117:DI=vec_select(r127:V1TI#0,parallel)
      REG_DEAD r127:V1TI
    9: r124:V2DI=vec_duplicate(r117:DI)
      REG_DEAD r117:DI
Failed to match this instruction:
(set (reg:V2DI 124)
    (vec_duplicate:V2DI (vec_select:DI (subreg:V2DI (reg:V1TI 127) 0)
            (parallel [
                    (const_int 0 [0])
                ]))))

(the patterns we do have use vec_concat instead).

Confirmed.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-27  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 17:02 [Bug middle-end/99293] New: " munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-26 17:07 ` [Bug middle-end/99293] " munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-27  0:52 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-06-05  5:09 ` [Bug target/99293] " meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-05  5:09 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99293-4-odhQMA7peY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).