From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 90EC2384B070; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:20:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90EC2384B070 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99305] [11 Regression] range condition simplification after inlining Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:20:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:20:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99305 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c.jj 2021-01-22 11:41:38.078708425 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c 2021-03-09 13:15:02.649094949 +0100 @@ -808,14 +808,14 @@ conditional_replacement (basic_block con nonzero_arg =3D arg0; else return false; - if (integer_all_onesp (nonzero_arg)) - neg =3D true; - else if (integer_pow2p (nonzero_arg)) + if (integer_pow2p (nonzero_arg)) { shift =3D tree_log2 (nonzero_arg); if (shift && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (nonzero_arg))) return false; } + else if (integer_all_onesp (nonzero_arg)) + neg =3D true; else return false; should fix this I think. For bool, integer_all_onesp and integer_onep and integer_pow2p are all true... We shouldn't negate in that case.=