public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "simon at pushface dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/99360] New: ICE in generalized iteration Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:55:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99360 Bug ID: 99360 Summary: ICE in generalized iteration Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: simon at pushface dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50292 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50292&action=edit Reproducer This is a regression from GCC 10. It arises when compiling a generalized iteration (in the case of the bug box below, 'for Cursor in V.Iterate loop', also for existential & universal quantifiers) against an independently-developed arm-eabi RTS[1]. It does *not* happen against f.e. ravenscar-full-stm32f4. This is the result of compiling with the native compiler against the set of files reported by the arm-eabi compiler (attached): $ gnatmake -c -u -f iteration.adb gcc -c iteration.adb +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+ | 11.0.0 20210205 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin15) Program_Error sem_ch8.adb:5490 explicit raise| | Error detected at iteration.adb:13:8 | | Please submit a bug report; see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . | | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug. | | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. | | Include the exact command that you entered. | | Also include sources listed below. | +==========================================================================+ Please include these source files with error report Note that list may not be accurate in some cases, so please double check that the problem can still be reproduced with the set of files listed. Consider also -gnatd.n switch (see debug.adb). system.ads iteration.adb ada.ads a-contai.ads a-cobove.ads a-iteint.ads a-stream.ads a-tags.ads s-stoele.ads s-secsta.ads s-parame.ads s-taskin.ads s-freert.ads interfac.ads s-fretas.ads s-stratt.ads s-unstyp.ads What investigation I've been able to do suggests that it's possibly related to tasking and/or finalization being brought in when not needed (it used not to be with GCC 10). Emmanuel B. (ex-AdaCore) said in [2]: Might be unrelated, but: we have noticed recently that a generalized iteration ("for..of") was wrongly calling `activate_task`. In particular, this resulted in errors when executing such loops from a protected object and enabling the checks that no potentially blocking operation is executed in such contexts. We reported this to AdaCore who fixed it in their more recent wavefronts. I am not sure when the error started to occur though, so maybe not that helpful to you :-) ---- [1] https://github.com/simonjwright/cortex-gnat-rts [2] https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/c5qncqgkgYk/m/Cp-mty5wAgAJ
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 11:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-03 11:55 simon at pushface dot org [this message] 2021-03-04 9:04 ` [Bug ada/99360] [11 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-04 9:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-04 9:27 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-04 22:37 ` simon at pushface dot org 2021-03-04 22:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 8:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-21 9:19 ` [Bug ada/99360] [11/12 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-21 9:21 ` [Bug ada/99360] [12 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-27 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-28 7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-12 17:17 ` simon at pushface dot org 2022-02-12 17:41 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).