public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2023 09:10:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99395-4-WAWNsSTbSV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-99395-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai --- Comment #6 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> --- Hi, Richi. Recently, I am evaluating TSVC performance of GCC: I found both RISC-V and aarch64 can SLP vectorize it: https://godbolt.org/z/ssvTxxjeT Both GCC-13 and trunk GCC can SLP it like LLVM (GCC-12 failed) but with -fno-vect-cost-model. I suspect we should adjust Vector COST model (I don't think we should ajust cost model in target backend since LLVM by default vectorize such case).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 9:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-04 23:01 [Bug middle-end/99395] New: " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-04 23:24 ` [Bug middle-end/99395] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-05 8:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99395] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-05 15:42 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-18 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-18 10:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-07 9:10 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai [this message] 2023-10-09 6:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-30 11:37 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-30 12:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-31 1:32 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 3:50 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 7:00 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 7:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-31 8:09 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 8:18 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-01-31 8:27 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 9:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-01-31 9:19 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai 2024-01-31 9:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-04-07 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99395-4-WAWNsSTbSV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).